Three New Species of Yellow-Shouldered Bats Found in Museum Collections
Scientists at Chicago’s Field Museum and international collaborators have reconstructed the phylogeny and biological history for the Yellow-shouldered bats in the New World tropics, the region of the Earth surrounding the equator. In-depth analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences uncovered three species new to science, each having previously been confused with another species. Since 1960, when modern studies on this group began, Sturnira has grown from eight species to 22. The newest additions were described in a new study, published online in ZooKeys.
The New World tropics have long been recognized as a region teeming with some of the richest biodiversity on planet Earth. It is home to a group of small, fruit-eating bats ranging from 0.5 oz – 3 oz in size. The bats belong to the genus Sturnira, commonly named yellow-shouldered bats, which are found from northern Mexico to northern Argentina. One species in particular, Sturnira lilium, has figured among the most widespread and locally abundant bats of the New World topics.
“A curator’s job is to bring order out of chaos,” said Bruce Patterson, MacArthur Curator of Mammals at The Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, IL. “This group of bats offered an excellent opportunity study the process of species formation across the entire New World tropics.”
The researchers isolated DNA from a small portion of liver or muscle samples that had been frozen or preserved from each specimen. They then amplified and sequenced two nuclear and three mitochondrial genes from each tissue, amounting to nearly 5,000 base pairs of DNA, from over 120 individuals.
“We chose these genes because they have proven useful for classification of related groups of bats,” said Velazco. “Mitochondrial sequences tend to be fast-evolving and informative about very recent evolutionary splits, while nuclear genes tend to be slow-evolving and shed light on more ancient divergence events.”
By sequencing both classes of DNA, the researchers could recover the group’s entire history, which stretches back about 8 million years.
Every museum specimen that was sequenced already had both a name and a geographic distribution. However, the sequence analysis led the investigators to believe that some of the branch labels were incorrect. Indeed, after re-examining the museum specimens associated with each sample, they found that nearly 20% of the specimens had been incorrectly labeled!
How could so many individual animals have been mis-identified?
The answer lies within technology. “The differences between species are often subtle, and difficult to describe in writing. The historic literature lacked access to the visual documentation that we rely on today, such as color photography and digital libraries,” said Patterson. “For this reason, small and imprecisely described morphological differences were often overlooked during the original identification of the specimens. This type of error pervades all biological collections.”
Their results identified three species entirely new to science, and provided evidence for the elevation of three subspecies to the species level. Two of the new species are described in the ZooKeys article.
In the process, Velazco and Patterson were able to revise the supposed geographic range of Sturnira lilium. Instead of extending from Mexico to Argentina, the real Sturnira lilium is limited to Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, and northern Argentina. The rest of its presumed range is occupied by six other close relatives that replace one another in jigsaw-like fashion across the Neotropics.
The distribution of Sturnira species across most of the New World tropics and its diversification throughout its 8 million-year existence make it informative for other sorts of biological reconstructions, such as the seed plants upon which it feeds.
In addition to its scientific usefulness, this study demonstrates the need for the ongoing revision of the Earth’s biological history, and highlights the immense value of museum collections in uncovering new knowledge.
“For this particular group of mammals, we are much closer that we were in framing their diversity, although there may be additional Sturnira out there,” said Patterson. “Over the years, I’ve learned that no one has the last word in science.”