Published: March 27, 2012

Of William Faulkner, vultures, and nature

John Bates, Curator and Section Head, Life Sciences, Negaunee Integrative Research Center

Going into the museum the other day, I got into the elevator in the Soldier Field parking garage behind two young women, they were talking to one another and I caught the conversation in the middle:

Going into the museum the other day, I got into the elevator in the Soldier Field parking garage behind two young women, they were talking to one another and I caught the conversation in the middle:

Young woman 1:  “…What do you have against birds?”

Young woman 2:  “I don’t know, I guess I’m just not a nature person”

When the elevator opened, we got out.  I walked ahead of them towards the museum and heard Red-winged Blackbirds, a singing Eastern Phoebe and calling Black-capped Chickadees from the artificial hillside which graces the north side of Soldier Field.  A crow was sitting on one of the light posts along McFetridge Drive.   As we got closer to the museum, I heard young woman 1 trying to get my attention: “Do you know where the west door is?”  I told them, but at that point, I had to ask what they were doing at the museum.  They said they were there for a class.  I said to have fun. Is there a chance that young woman 2 became more of a “nature person” as the result of her trip?  I sure hope so.  I am convinced our institution can have that effect on people.

I have tied this incident to this William Faulkner quote I ran into while looking for something on the web.  Young woman 2 admitted she was not a nature person, I feel like Faulkner thought he knew something about nature.  Who am I to express a negative opinion about one of America’s greatest writers?  I get frustrated by what I feel is a heightened sense of anthropocentrism in the world, where biodiversity is pushed aside by humans.  Reading this quote, my feeling was, that like too many other people, Faulkner thought he had vultures figured out, when all he really was illustrating was a weak connection to the natural world, just like Young woman 2.

I contend that Faulkner knew little about “buzzards” (a largely southern term for vultures), and that he is wrong in just about every way he thinks about them. Vultures eat carrion (dead things), but that actually is fairly specialized, they do not eat “anything.”  Faulkner thinks that nothing “needs” them, but like it or not, vultures are part of their ecosystems, just like humans.  For example, mammalian scavengers often rely on seeing circling vultures to find carcasses.  Also, various species of parasites have evolved to live on vultures (just like those on humans).  Humans even “want” vultures, sometimes.  The sense of smell of a Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura) is so good that putting beta-mercaptanol (a compound produced by rotting flesh) into the long natural gas pipelines stretching across large portions of the western U.S. allowed workers to find leaks in those lines by the vultures that were attracted to the smell at the leak site. 

Unfortunately, I also think a lot of people do “hate” vultures.  For instance in many parts of the New World tropics, Black Vultures (Coragyps aratus) will hang around trash dumps. Several years ago, the presence of large numbers of these Vultures near the runway led to the closing of the airport of the town of Tefé in the Brazilian Amazon.  The solution was to move the dump was which also moved the vultures, so you can say that they can be a headache.

One of Tefé, Brazil 's Black Vultures along the riverfront.

Finally, many vultures actually are “in danger.”  In Asia and Africa, almost all species have suffered substantial population declines, collateral losses as humans use a pesticide called Furadan to poison predators preying on their herds of cattle and goats.

Maybe I am being too hard on Faulkner, I doubt there is much envy associated with vultures, but for as great a writer as he was, I suspect he was disappointed if actually got his reincarnation wish given the situation in which vultures have to share the planet with us.  We definitely need more “nature people.”


John Bates
Curator and Section Head, Life Sciences

Contact Information

The tropics harbor the highest species diversity on the planet.  I am most intrigued by evolution at the tips of the tree of life.  My students and I study genetic structure in tropical birds and other organisms to address how this diversity evolved and how it continues to evolve as climates change and humans continue to alter landscapes.

We study comparative genetic structure and evolution primarily in the Afrotropics, the Neotropics, and the Asian tropics.  I am an ornithologist, but students working with me and my wife Shannon Hackett and other museum curators also have studied amphibians and small mammals (bats and rodents) and more recently internal, external and blood parasites (e.g., Lutz et al. 2015, Block et al. 2015, Patitucci et al. 2016).  Research in the our lab has involved gathering and interpreting genetic data in both phylogeographic and phylogenetic frameworks. Phylogenetic work on Neotropical birds has focused on rates of diversification and comparative biogeography (Tello and Bates 2007, Pantané et al 2009, Patel et al. 2011, Lutz et al. 2013, Dantas et al. 2015).  Phylogeographic work has sought to understand comparative patterns of divergence at level of population and species across different biomes (Bates et al 2003, Bates et al. 2004, Bowie et al. 2006, I. Caballero dissertation research, Block et al. 2015, Winger and Bates 2015, Lawson et al. 2015).  We also have used genetic data to better understand evolutionary patterns in relation to climate change across landscapes (e.g., Carnaval and Bates 2007) that include the Albertine Rift (through our MacArthur Grants, e.g., Voelker et al. 2010, Engel et al. 2014), the Eastern Arc Mountains (Lawson dissertation research, Lawson et al. 2015), the Philippines (T. Roberts and S. Weyandt dissertation research) and South America, particularly the Amazon (Savit dissertation research, Savit and Bates 2015, Figueiredo et al. 2013), and we are entering into the genomic realm focusing initially on Andean (Winger et al. 2015) and Amazonian birds (through our NSF Dimensions of Diversity grant). Shane DuBay is doing his dissertation research in the Himalayas on physiological plasticity in Tarsiger Bush Robins.  Nick Crouch, who I co-advise at U. Illinois, Chicago with Roberta Mason-Gamer, is studying specialization in birds from a modern phylogenetic perspective.  We seek to create a broader understanding of diversification in the tropics from a comparative biogeographic framework (Silva and Bates 2002, Kahindo et al, 2007, Bates et al. 2008, Antonelli et al. 2009).  João Capurucho (U. Illinois, Chicago, co-advised with Mary Ashley)  is studying phlylogeography of Amazonian white sand specialist birds and Natalia Piland (Committee on Evolutionary Biology, U. Chicago) is studying the impact of urbanization on Neotropical birds.  New graduate student Valentina Gomez Bahamon (U. Illinois, Chicago) is also working Boris Igic and me, after doing her Master Degree in her native Colombia on genomics and the evolution of migrating Fork-tailed Flycatchers (Tyrannus savana).  Jacob Cooper (Committee on Evolutionary Biology, U. Chicago) is studying the diversification of birds in Afromonte forests

Josh Engel and I are working up multi-species phylogeographic studies of birds across the Albertine Rift, based the Bird Division's long term research throughout the region.  We are working up similar data sets for Malawian birds.  Our current NSF Dimensions of Diversity grant on the assembly of the Amazonian biota and our NSF grant to survey birds and their parasites across the southern Amazon are generating genomic data for analysis in collaboration with paleoecologists, climatologists, geologists, and remote sensing experts from the U.S. and Brazil.  These large collaborative projects are providing new perspectives on the history of Amazonia.